Strategic Considerations for Selecting European Cloud Providers

The selection of cloud infrastructure represents a critical strategic decision with long-term implications for data governance, operational stability, and compliance. For organizations operating in or serving European markets, European-based providers offer distinct advantages worth systematic evaluation.

The "multi-cloud" concept

European organizations predominantly operate under a restricted cloud paradigm: AWS/Azure or on-premises. This framing—reinforced by high-profile cases like Basecamp’s repatriation—has unfortunately excluded viable European cloud service provider alternatives.

The “multi-cloud” concept has been redefined through marketing to mean only AWS-Azure combinations, though sometimes including GCP or Baidu. This narrowing serves hyperscaler interests while obscuring legitimate European providers offering:

  • Geographic distribution across 10+ European countries with 30+ data centers
  • Technical feature parity in core infrastructure services
  • CNCF-certified Kubernetes from 8 of 10 major providers
  • Cost advantages in specific categories (block storage from €0.03/GB/month, object storage from €0.01/GB/month)
  • Data residency guarantees with contractual clarity

Reviewing the offerings from EU providers shows performance equivalence for containerized workloads, eliminating historical technical objections.

  1. Digital sovereignty crisis: A case from the Netherlands exemplifies EU-wide vulnerability. Critical technology sectors relying on US cloud infrastructure face direct security risks when export restrictions force operational adjustments, demonstrating how cloud dependencies translate to industrial policy constraints.
  2. Regulatory enforcement collision: US Cloud Act (enabling data access regardless of storage location) directly conflicts with GDPR provisions. European Court of Justice invalidated the Privacy Shield framework precisely due to this conflict.
  3. Market intervention escalation: The EU Digital Markets Act explicitly targets US hyperscalers with new interoperability requirements and anti-self-preferencing provisions.

European providers like OVHcloud, Deutsche Telekom, and Orange Business Services operate outside these jurisdictional conflicts. The European Commission now explicitly advocates reducing critical infrastructure dependencies on non-EU providers, with Commissioner Breton already in 2020 highlighting the importance of a European digital infrastructure.

Cost Structure Analysis

European cloud providers typically present different cost profiles than US-based alternatives:

Factor

European Providers

US Hyperscalers

Base compute

Often 10-15% higher for base costs, but managed services do not add to the costs in the same degree

Base costs typically lower due to scale, but higher when part of managed services

Data egress

Significantly lower or free between EU regions

Higher with rigid tiering

Factor

European Providers

US Hyperscalers

Bandwidth

More flexible pricing models

Standardized global pricing

Custom SLAs

More negotiable

Generally standardized

Critically, European providers often eliminate unpredictable data transfer fees between regions, enabling more accurate forecasting and potentially lower total cost for data-intensive workloads.

Local Support Structures

Support structure quality fundamentally affects incident response capabilities and operational efficiency:

  • Time zone alignment: European providers operate primary support centers in CET/CEST time zones.
  • Language coverage: Comprehensive support in major European languages (beyond English).
  • Regulatory expertise: Support staff trained in European compliance requirements.
  • Physical proximity: On-site support capabilities for hybrid infrastructures.

Organizations should evaluate support SLAs with particular attention to:

  • Response time guarantees during European business hours
  • Escalation paths with locally empowered decision-makers
  • Documentation and interfaces in required languages
  • Professional services availability for compliance-related configuration

Technical Capability Assessment

European providers have historically lagged in certain technical capabilities but have closed gaps in key areas:

Factor

European Providers

US Hyperscalers

Bandwidth

More flexible pricing models

Standardized global pricing

How AdaLab Can Help

How AdaLab Can Help

Ready-to-Use, Scalable Kubernetes Setup

AdaLab’s Kubernetes solution is fully set up for you, solving common issues like slow performance, resource bottlenecks, and Kubernetes configuration and management. It’s designed to scale easily, letting you focus on your projects instead of the infrastructure.

Custom, Shareable Kernels

AdaLab makes it simple to create and share custom kernels. These stable, reliable environments can be tailored to each project, and you can create as many as you need, ensuring consistency across your team.

Strong Security in a Cloud-Based Setup

With AdaLab’s secure, cloud-based structure, data protection is built-in. Each user’s environment is isolated and hard to access from outside, adding a solid layer of security for teams with sensitive data.

How AdaLab Can Help

Ready to Scale Up?

If your Jupyter setup isn’t keeping up with your team’s needs, it’s time to consider a more scalable solution. AdaLab can help make your transition smooth, boosting performance, security, and collaboration.


Reach out to see how we can support your team’s growth and get your Jupyter environment ready for the next level!