A monolithic Jupyter setup refers to a basic configuration where JupyterHub and Jupyter Notebooks are run on a single machine—typically a local server—with one or a few kernels. The kernel is the computational engine that executes your code, and in a monolithic setup, all operations (coding, data processing, visualization) are confined to that single machine.
This type of setup is most common among solo users working on smaller projects, such as individual data analysis, prototyping, or light development work. It’s the default choice for many users when they start with Jupyter because it’s easy to install, requires minimal configuration, and works well for a range of simple tasks.
As projects grow, the limitations of a monolithic Jupyter setup become clear. What once worked for small tasks now faces major challenges that can slow down work and frustrate teams. Here are some of the key pain points when scaling:
As datasets grow and computations become more complex, your single machine starts to struggle. The limited CPU and memory can’t handle heavy workloads, leading to slowdowns, crashes, or frequent kernel restarts. This wastes valuable human time as you wait for processes to finish, turning what should be productive work into a constant battle with your system.
In a monolithic setup, sharing notebooks and keeping dependencies in sync across a team becomes difficult. If one person updates a library, it can break someone else’s work. Managing version control for Jupyter notebooks is also tricky, leading to conflicts when multiple contributors work on the same notebook. Collaboration becomes a headache instead of a smooth process.
As the environment grows, so does the effort needed to maintain it. Manually managing libraries and system configurations for different projects or users adds up over time. The more people involved, the higher the maintenance overhead, with constant updates and troubleshooting needed to keep everything working.
With multiple users on the same setup, conflicting needs can arise. One person might need a specific library version, while another needs something entirely different. Without proper isolation, these conflicting requests create dependency problems and slow down progress as well as increase the user dissatisfaction with the system maintainers.
If your kernels are slow to start, processing takes longer than it should, or you’re dealing with frequent crashes, it’s a sign your setup can’t handle your workload. Large datasets and complex computations are likely overloading your machine, slowing down your entire workflow.
As your work involves multiple kernels, languages, or requires distributed computing, a single Jupyter instance struggles to keep up. Managing Python, R, or other languages on the same system becomes complicated, and performing parallel processing or distributed tasks is nearly impossible.
If you’re dealing with sensitive data, security and isolation are key. A basic monolithic setup makes it difficult to control access and protect confidential information. Furthermore, since all users’ files are stored on a single server, they are equally vulnerable. If the server is compromised, it puts everything at risk, meaning a security breach could expose all data without proper isolation or safeguards in place. As the stakes get higher with regulated or private data, a more secure and scalable setup is necessary.
Combining JupyterHub with Docker Swarm boosts scalability and flexibility by allowing you to manage containers across multiple machines. Here’s why this is powerful:
JupyterHub in Kubernetes, also called Zero to JupyterHub (Z2JH), is another powerful option for scaling beyond a monolithic setup. Kubernetes automates the deployment and management of JupyterHub across a cluster, giving you:
Cloud platforms such as Google Colab, Databricks, AWS SageMaker Studio, and Azure Notebooks make it easy to scale and collaborate without managing servers. These platforms handle infrastructure, scaling, and environment management, allowing you to focus on your work without worrying about server maintenance or scaling issues.
Automatic Scaling:
Cloud platforms adjust resources based on your workload, so you only pay for what you use.
Collaboration:
Many of these tools support real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work together seamlessly.
Built-in Tools:
They often come with pre-installed machine learning libraries, GPU/TPU access, and data integration options.
Cloud solutions are ideal for teams needing flexibility, quick setup, and hassle-free scalability.
Cloud Solutions:
Cloud platforms (e.g., AWS SageMaker, Azure Notebooks) are cost-effective initially, as you only pay for what you use. However, costs can rise quickly for teams with heavy or constant usage..
On-Premise Solutions:
While on-premise setups have higher initial costs (hardware, setup), they can be more affordable over time if your team uses them heavily and consistently. They’re ideal for teams that want control over costs long-term.
Kubernetes:
JupyterHub on Kubernetes offers high scalability and reliability but requires technical expertise and a more complex setup. This option suits teams with bigger plans and more technical resources. capacity.
Simper Solutions:
Options like Docker Swarm or managed cloud Jupyter services are easier to set up and maintain but may reach their limits as your needs grow. They’re great for small teams or projects with basic scaling needs.
Self Managed:
On-premise and self-managed cloud setups offer more control but need dedicated maintenance and support from your team, which may require extra resources.
Managed Services:
Cloud-based solutions (like Google Colab or Azure Notebooks) handle updates, troubleshooting, and maintenance, making them convenient. However, you depend on the provider’s availability and pricing changes (also vendor lock-in risk)
Choosing the right approach depends on your team’s budget, skills, and growth plans. Cloud services offer simplicity, while self-managed options give you control and potentially better long-term cost savings.
AdaLab’s Kubernetes solution is fully set up for you, solving common issues like slow performance, resource bottlenecks, and Kubernetes configuration and management. It’s designed to scale easily, letting you focus on your projects instead of the infrastructure.
AdaLab makes it simple to create and share custom kernels. These stable, reliable environments can be tailored to each project, and you can create as many as you need, ensuring consistency across your team.
With AdaLab’s secure, cloud-based structure, data protection is built-in. Each user’s environment is isolated and hard to access from outside, adding a solid layer of security for teams with sensitive data.
Reach out to see how we can support your team’s growth and get your Jupyter environment ready for the next level!
Where data tools and teams unite.
